{"id":132253,"date":"2024-12-01T21:51:51","date_gmt":"2024-12-01T14:51:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hotvideos24.online\/?p=132253"},"modified":"2024-12-01T21:51:51","modified_gmt":"2024-12-01T14:51:51","slug":"with-brain-preservation-nobody-has-to-die-meet-the-neuroscientist-who-believes-life-could-be-eternal-neuroscience","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hotvideos24.online\/?p=132253","title":{"rendered":"\u2018With brain preservation, nobody has to die\u2019: meet the neuroscientist who believes life could be eternal | Neuroscience"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-3711241968723425\"\r\n     crossorigin=\"anonymous\"><\/script>\r\n<ins class=\"adsbygoogle\"\r\n     style=\"display:block\"\r\n     data-ad-format=\"fluid\"\r\n     data-ad-layout-key=\"-fb+5w+4e-db+86\"\r\n     data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-3711241968723425\"\r\n     data-ad-slot=\"7910942971\"><\/ins>\r\n<script>\r\n     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});\r\n<\/script><br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\"><span style=\"color:var(--drop-cap);font-weight:700;\" class=\"dcr-15rw6c2\">E<\/span>lizabeth Hughes Gossett shouldn\u2019t have survived beyond 11, the age at which she developed type 1 diabetes. Born in Albany, New York, Gossett received her diagnosis in 1918 when diabetes had no known treatment. Tragically, her life expectancy was just a matter of months. Her parents desperately searched for any way to keep their daughter alive. A New Jersey physician had developed a radical course of action: keeping the blood sugar levels of diabetic children low by feeding them the bare minimum needed to survive. This could see a prognosis of months extended to years. These young patients weren\u2019t exactly <em>living, <\/em>but they were alive.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">In the spring of 1919, Gossett went into this starvation clinic. She\u2019d have been constantly cold and hungry. Emaciated, unable to move or grow. At its lowest, her weight dropped to 20kg. Three years later, Gossett was lingering on death\u2019s threshold but, crucially, hadn\u2019t crossed to the other side.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">\u201cAnd as result,\u201d Dr Ariel Zeleznikow-Johnston explains to me, \u201cshe was still alive when, in 1921, what had hitherto seemed impossible was achieved: insulin treatment was developed.\u201d Gossett received her first injection of the hormone in 1922 and started to eat again, move again, <em>live <\/em>again. She survived into her 70s, taking about 42,000 insulin shots in that time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">\u201cYou see,\u201d Zeleznikow-Johnston says, \u201cfor millions of years, people just died from diabetes, something that was thought to be inevitable. Unchangeable. Then suddenly, from nowhere, this was no longer true.\u201d In Gossett\u2019s case, there was a limbo period: years between her diagnosis and a treatment becoming available. \u201cIn 1918, most kids diagnosed with type 1 diabetes died. Elizabeth didn\u2019t, because the pause button was pressed and, as a result, a future was bought for her. That\u2019s what I\u2019m advocating for.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">It\u2019s this idea which lies at the heart of Zeleznikow-Johnston\u2019s new book, <em>The Future Loves You: How and Why We Should Abolish Death<\/em>. A manifesto for \u2013 and road map to, he hopes \u2013 today\u2019s terminally diseased and dying being offered a pause button of their own. A chance to halt their biological clocks, until such a time that science and medicine has advanced sufficiently. Maybe, even, the prospect of immortality. He\u2019s convinced the technology already exists to make much of this possible, and costs little more than a midrange secondhand car.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">Zeleznikow-Johnston, 31, is a research fellow at Melbourne\u2019s Monash University. \u201cI\u2019ve been interested in neuroscience forever,\u201d he says, from his recently acquired, bright, campus office. \u201cIt\u2019s the confluence of biology \u2013 the wet mechanics \u2013 of how cells and neurons work, philosophical questions of identity, and the fun, cognitive mechanics of how the brain functions.\u201d You know that feeling of having a word on the tip of your tongue, but can\u2019t quite get it? \u201cWorking out what\u2019s happening there,\u201d he says, \u201cis basically my day job. Exploring how brains give rise to consciousness.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure id=\"6e2d278d-3485-4e7a-9401-bef113266527\" data-spacefinder-role=\"inline\" data-spacefinder-type=\"model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.ImageBlockElement\" class=\" dcr-173mewl\"><figcaption data-spacefinder-role=\"inline\" class=\"dcr-1fujct4\"><span class=\"dcr-1inf02i\"><svg width=\"18\" height=\"13\" viewbox=\"0 0 18 13\"><path d=\"M18 3.5v8l-1.5 1.5h-15l-1.5-1.5v-8l1.5-1.5h3.5l2-2h4l2 2h3.5l1.5 1.5zm-9 7.5c1.9 0 3.5-1.6 3.5-3.5s-1.6-3.5-3.5-3.5-3.5 1.6-3.5 3.5 1.6 3.5 3.5 3.5z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><span class=\"dcr-1qvd3m6\">Brains on ice: a medical researcher adjusts his refrigerator.<\/span> Photograph: Xiaoke Chen\/Getty Images<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">He\u2019s also interested in the history of medical progress and where the future lies. \u201cLogically, where we can expect this technology to be in 10, 20, 100 years from now. That\u2019s what took me to the prospect of preservation: how we might still be around in decades and centuries to come.\u201d In other words, could we give ourselves a shot at making use of medicine\u2019s far-off advances? \u201cWith the advent of brain preservation,\u201d he writes, \u201cI don\u2019t think that you, or anyone you love, has to die at all.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\"><em><strong>First, though, a much simpler<\/strong><\/em> question: would you even want life eternal? So outlandish is the notion, you\u2019ve likely given it little thought. In his line of work, it\u2019s a topic Zeleznikow-Johnston finds himself grappling with regularly. \u201cReminders that my brain and body are constantly decaying,\u201d he says, \u201ccan become a bit much from time to time; it can feel heightened. And I\u2019ve always been suspicious that our societal acceptance of death comes from an inability to imagine anything otherwise.\u201d It\u2019s a hunch, he says, that\u2019s not purely anecdotal: scientific literature, he mentions, backs him up.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">\u201cStudies show that if you survey people across all ages,\u201d he says, \u201cand ask how long they\u2019d like to live for, most only ask for five to 10 years longer than their demographic is statistically likely to get: 90, let\u2019s say.\u201d Zeleznikow-Johnston believes this presents an incomplete picture.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">Research also shows these answers change when it\u2019s stipulated that respondents would be guaranteed good mental and physical health into their later decades. \u201cImmediately the figure jumps: 120 years, 150, longer. And there\u2019s a strong correlation between someone\u2019s age and how long they say they want to live for: the older you get, the further away you want the deadline. When you survey terminally ill people, in hospices and on their deathbed, the vast majority still have a very strong will to live. In most circumstances, I\u2019d argue, people would like to live longer, but feel it\u2019s not possible.\u201d In essence, as our deadline approaches, few people actually want to die.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"8b789eb6-faf9-4100-9f7d-86a58931fcca\" data-spacefinder-role=\"supporting\" data-spacefinder-type=\"model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.ImageBlockElement\" class=\" dcr-a2pvoh\"><figcaption data-spacefinder-role=\"inline\" class=\"dcr-1pvqcrw\"><span class=\"dcr-1inf02i\"><svg width=\"18\" height=\"13\" viewbox=\"0 0 18 13\"><path d=\"M18 3.5v8l-1.5 1.5h-15l-1.5-1.5v-8l1.5-1.5h3.5l2-2h4l2 2h3.5l1.5 1.5zm-9 7.5c1.9 0 3.5-1.6 3.5-3.5s-1.6-3.5-3.5-3.5-3.5 1.6-3.5 3.5 1.6 3.5 3.5 3.5z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><span class=\"dcr-1qvd3m6\">Elizabeth Hughes Gossett: without insulin she would have died of type 1 diabetes. Might not the things we die from now have cures?<\/span> Photograph: Science History Images\/Alamy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">It\u2019s a divergence from much received wisdom. Twentieth-century thinkers like Bernard Williams and Viktor Frankl posited that death gives life meaning. It\u2019s an argument Zeleznikow-Johnston offers short shrift. \u201cSome say we need death because it sets a deadline to achieve goals,\u201d he says, \u201cbut that\u2019s not compelling.\u201d In his book, he rejects, too, suggested environmental and social benefits of dying, too.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">\u201cIt\u2019s less that there are strong arguments why death is good,\u201d he argues, \u201cbut what I call palliative philosophy: death is inevitable, we want convincing reasons as to why that\u2019s good, so we create them. In fact, we spend vast amounts globally on healthcare and medical research.\u201d It makes up 10% of global economic activity. \u201cModern medicine is really the practice of trying to keep death at bay. But we haven\u2019t yet acknowledged or agreed \u2013 as a society \u2013 that the end goal of medical research is actually to eliminate disease completely.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">\u201cIn the early 2000s,\u201d he says, \u201cspecialists were pushing for urgent debates about AI capability and safety. There was no timeline, but they warned of what was coming.\u201d Their pleas weren\u2019t heeded. \u201cFrom 2012, AI exploded. Wider society hadn\u2019t talked about it, and now we\u2019re under-equipped and under-prepared.\u201d Zeleznikow-Johnston suspects a similar revolution in mortality is creeping up on us. Even if you dismiss the rest of what he\u2019s advocating, he says, on the topic of \u201cdefeating death: good or bad?\u201d we ought to make up our minds. Presuming we opt for the latter, Zeleznikow-Johnston reckons he might just have a plan.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\"><em><strong>Before grappling with the<\/strong><\/em> practicalities of extending our lifespans, consider its foundations, he says. \u201cOnly when we understand what it is to die, can we consider what it means to keep living. Sure,\u201d he concedes, \u201cif someone developed an anti-ageing drug that halted the ageing process, it wouldn\u2019t need wider discussion.\u201d We\u2019d simply live as we do now, with the prospect of life lasting indefinitely, if we remain out of harm\u2019s way. But this isn\u2019t quite Zeleznikow-Johnston\u2019s vision. His is complex, with any potential payoffs in the distant future. Possibly, he\u2019d see us resurrected in unrecognisable forms. \u201cPeople assume we have a crisp, clear idea of what death is,\u201d he says, \u201cwhen that\u2019s not the case: it\u2019s far murkier.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">In his book, <em>The Future Loves You<\/em>, Zeleznikow-Johnston outlines how the demarcation between life and death blurs. \u201cUntil the middle of the 20th century, if you stopped breathing and your heart stopped beating, you were declared dead. No further interventions were available.\u201d Technology changed things. \u201cWe developed mechanical ventilators to keep us breathing; machines to keep blood circulating when the heart stops.\u201d Today, life support devices can act as a fully artificial heart and lungs. \u201cThese advances pushed us toward a definition of death based on brain activity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">In 1968, brain death was introduced into clinical practice: the irreversible cessation of brain functions. Once again, scientific advances now suggest this might be defunct. \u201cWe see that little bits of brain function, like regulation of body temperature or hormone function, can remain, even when most medics would declare someone dead,\u201d he says. Increasingly, medical innovations will allow for certain brain functions to be replicated artificially. \u201cProsthetics are returning blood pressure control to spinal injury patients. After stroke or brain damage, implants can let people talk or use limbs. It\u2019s fairly primitive now, but they\u2019ll improve.\u201d Where, then, do we draw the life\/death line?<\/p>\n<figure id=\"b2dc5984-e943-462e-8685-bd61de2482e2\" data-spacefinder-role=\"showcase\" data-spacefinder-type=\"model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.ImageBlockElement\" class=\" dcr-5h0uf4\"><figcaption data-spacefinder-role=\"inline\" class=\"dcr-1pvqcrw\"><span class=\"dcr-1inf02i\"><svg width=\"18\" height=\"13\" viewbox=\"0 0 18 13\"><path d=\"M18 3.5v8l-1.5 1.5h-15l-1.5-1.5v-8l1.5-1.5h3.5l2-2h4l2 2h3.5l1.5 1.5zm-9 7.5c1.9 0 3.5-1.6 3.5-3.5s-1.6-3.5-3.5-3.5-3.5 1.6-3.5 3.5 1.6 3.5 3.5 3.5z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><span class=\"dcr-1qvd3m6\">Medical breakthrough: the first use of ether as an anaesthetic in dental surgery, Boston, USA, 1846.<\/span> Photograph: Science &amp; Society Picture Library\/SSPL\/Getty Images<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">Increasingly, says Zeleznikow-Johnston, experts are turning to identity. \u201cMaybe a real definition of death,\u201d he says, \u201cis when someone\u2019s personal identity \u2013 their connectome \u2013 is permanently lost.\u201d In layperson\u2019s terms, when our unique consciousness disappears for good. \u201cMost relevant are areas of the brain like the cortex: home to personality and long-term memory.\u201d Much like the total of our genetic makeup is known as our genome, our identity is found in what\u2019s labelled our connectome; the entirety of connections between neurons in our brains. \u201cIt can\u2019t be about the physical stuff in our brain,\u201d he says; the cells which make up our body mass continually renew over the course of a lifetime.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">Just as it\u2019s the words printed in a book, rather than the specific ink used to form them, that gives its pages meaning, Zeleznikow-Johnston believes the same to be true of you and I. Here lies the heart of Zeleznikow-Johnston\u2019s proposition. \u201cIf that\u2019s the case, then what can we do <em>now<\/em> to preserve these identities, when we can\u2019t currently cure someone\u2019s health issue, but might in the future, if only we could buy some time.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">With current technology<em><strong>, <\/strong><\/em>Zeleznikow-Johnston believes, this is already possible; scientifically straightforward, too. There are the obvious examples where we press pause already: sperm, eggs or embryos can be frozen in stasis for decades before being implanted. \u201cWhat you\u2019re likely less aware of,\u201d he says, \u201care other analogous surgical procedures already in use. Sometimes, during surgery for aneurysms, or damage to blood vessels around the heart, doctors cannot simply route around with bypasses.\u201d Blood flow in these bodies needs halting if an operation has any chance of success. In normal circumstances, this would prove fatal. For decades, however, surgeons have been circumventing death with a technique known as deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">\u201cIt\u2019s essentially medical hypothermia,\u201d he says. \u201cCool someone\u2019s body down to around 20C, their heart and brain activity and blood circulation will totally stop.\u201d Essentially, the patient looks dead. Procedures can last 30-40 minutes. \u201cThen once re-warmed, miraculously, most of the time patients are restored to consciousness with cognitive function intact.\u201d After 60 minutes in this state, the risk of brain injury increases. \u201cBut it\u2019s a useful precedent: putting people in stasis might be possible if done right, as long as we hold on to those psychological properties inside the connectome.\u201d<\/p>\n<aside data-spacefinder-role=\"supporting\" class=\"dcr-1eyan6r\"><svg viewbox=\"0 0 22 14\" style=\"fill:var(--pullquote-icon);\" class=\"dcr-scql1j\"><path d=\"M5.255 0h4.75c-.572 4.53-1.077 8.972-1.297 13.941H0C.792 9.104 2.44 4.53 5.255 0Zm11.061 0H21c-.506 4.53-1.077 8.972-1.297 13.941h-8.686c.902-4.837 2.485-9.411 5.3-13.941Z\"\/><\/svg><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"dcr-zzndwp\"><p>Up until the 20th century if your heart stopped beating, you were dead<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/aside>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">Rudimentary efforts to achieve this started in the mid-1960s: American psychology professor James Bedford, the first human to be frozen; cryonically preserved. To date, roughly 600 people globally have undergone a cryonic procedure. \u201cThere\u2019s good reason to think techniques used in previous decades are just no good,\u201d argues Zeleznikow-Johnston. \u201cTry to straight freeze a human body or brain, ice crystals destroy the tissue. More complicated versions have been tried, the addition of what\u2019s ostensibly antifreeze, but they\u2019ve led to severe dehydration.\u201d Put bluntly, brains shrivel up. \u201cObviously, nobody has demonstrated the reversal of the process, and brain tissue preserved this way doesn\u2019t look good under a microscope.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\"><em><strong>Now, Zeleznikow-Johnston<\/strong><\/em> offers an alternative suggestion: aldehyde-stabilised cryopreservation, also known as fixation. \u201cEssentially,\u201d he says, \u201cby introducing chemicals at the opportune moment which preserve the structure of someone\u2019s brain, we can hold onto its circuitry and structures.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">Once frozen, in essence, preserving our identity indefinitely. \u201cIn labs, this process of fixation is used routinely with animal research. Developed in 2015, it\u2019s not a complicated procedure and has been tested on large animals and humans, postmortem.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">Two groups on the US west coast, Zeleznikow-Johnston tells me, are on the cusp of offering this to the public. Another in Europe. \u201cIt can certainly be done today,\u201d he\u2019s confident, \u201cand in the next year, it\u2019ll be more accessible. It could be rolled out quickly, if there was demand.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">He tots up rough costs in the book\u2019s closing chapters: at today\u2019s prices, roughly $13,000 should pay for the initial preservation procedure. If done at scale, a further $1,300 annually should account for on-going storage and associated admin costs. \u201cI\u2019m not an accountant,\u201d he adds, \u201cbut that\u2019s my best estimate.\u201d Small change compared to the cash required for many medical procedures \u2013 from cancer therapies to transplants.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">But how we might eventually resurrect remains unclear. What use is pressing pause without a restart button? There, he accepts, we\u2019re firmly into the field of sci-fi. Unfazed, Zeleznikow-Johnston opines that major advances in nanomedicine offer one route; else there\u2019s what\u2019s known as mind-uploading, or mind-emulation \u2013 transferring someone to a digital form. \u201cBreak down the elements and it\u2019s a fairly straightforward extrapolation from today\u2019s technology,\u201d he says. \u201cTake very high resolution scans of brain structure to characterise how someone\u2019s neurons work, recreate it in a digital format then put it in another robotic, virtual or biological body.\u201d Future scientists will need to fill in the details. \u201cYet if the memories and experiences which define us are held on to, a person has survived. A robotic or digital brain, if done right, I\u2019d argue, is still you.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">If tomorrow, Zeleznikow-Johnston received a terminal diagnosis, he\u2019d eventually undergo the brain preservation procedure. He\u2019d encourage friends and family to follow. \u201cMy fear of death hasn\u2019t been assuaged,\u201d he says. \u201cIt still scares me. What I\u2019m proposing isn\u2019t magic, even if it comes to fruition.\u201d Countless variables would need to land in our favour: the tech developed and implemented properly. Nuclear war and climate catastrophe avoided. Some future generation opting to offer their distant ancestors another chance at life. \u201cEven with a guarantee of everyone I love returning, I\u2019d still miss them in the short term, but it does provide some comfort. My existential despair that everyone I love will one day disappear hasn\u2019t gone away completely, but it offers a glimmer of hope.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">Still unconvinced? Just look, he urges, to anaesthesia. \u201cPrior to the mid-19th century, if you needed an operation, you just had to cope with the pain. Yes, you could take some herbs, alcohol; maybe opiates if they were available.\u201d Alternatives included what was, ostensibly, strangulation, else delivering a knockout blow to the patient\u2019s head. \u201cThis was the case throughout human history, until the discovery of anaesthesia. It was an unprecedented change. No longer did you have to suffer.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\">There\u2019s far from consensus on these topics: much is uncharted territory. A newly published survey of 300 neuroscientists found 40% predict brain preservation and restoration will prove possible. Still, Zeleznikow-Johnston is more than prepared to see his entire thesis shot down. \u201cSceptics should put in the effort to scrutinise and critically appraise my proposal,\u201d he says, \u201ceither proving that what I\u2019m advocating for can\u2019t work \u2013 in which case I\u2019ll apologise and abandon it \u2013 or they\u2019ll realise what I\u2019m suggesting has merit. It\u2019s time to establish an academic consensus on the current and near-term feasibility of brain preservation.\u201d One thing, however, is for certain: in an instant, what was once believed impossible can become just another fact of life.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1eu361v\"><em>The Future Loves You: How and Why we Should Abolish Death by Dr Ariel Zeleznikow-Johnston, published by Allen Lane at \u00a325. Buy it for \u00a322.50 from <a href=\"https:\/\/guardianbookshop.com\/the-future-loves-you-9780241655894\/\" data-link-name=\"in body link\">guardianbookshop.com<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-3711241968723425\"\r\n     crossorigin=\"anonymous\"><\/script>\r\n<ins class=\"adsbygoogle\"\r\n     style=\"display:block\"\r\n     data-ad-format=\"fluid\"\r\n     data-ad-layout-key=\"-fb+5w+4e-db+86\"\r\n     data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-3711241968723425\"\r\n     data-ad-slot=\"7910942971\"><\/ins>\r\n<script>\r\n     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});\r\n<\/script><br \/>\n<br \/><div data-type=\"_mgwidget\" data-widget-id=\"1660802\">\r\n<\/div>\r\n<script>(function(w,q){w[q]=w[q]||[];w[q].push([\"_mgc.load\"])})(window,\"_mgq\");\r\n<\/script>\r\n<br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/science\/2024\/dec\/01\/with-brain-preservation-nobody-has-to-die-meet-the-neuroscientist-who-believes-life-could-be-eternal\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Elizabeth Hughes Gossett shouldn\u2019t have survived beyond 11, the age at which she developed type 1 diabetes. Born in Albany, New York, Gossett received her diagnosis in 1918 when diabetes &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/hotvideos24.online\/?p=132253\" class=\"more-link\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-132253","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hotvideos24.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132253","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hotvideos24.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hotvideos24.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hotvideos24.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hotvideos24.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=132253"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hotvideos24.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132253\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hotvideos24.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=132253"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hotvideos24.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=132253"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hotvideos24.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=132253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}